Skip to main content

Table 2 Utility of Method 1–4 – PPV- to target P1 children at increased-risk (standards 1, 2 & 3)

From: Effectiveness and reach of a directed-population approach to improving dental health and reducing inequalities: a cross sectional study

Health board

(1) Caries experience (dmft>0)

(2) Local SIMD1

(3) National SIMD1

 

M11

M22

M33

M44

M1

M2

M3

M4

M1

M2

M3

M4

A&A

59.9%

51.1%

61.6%

50.3%

38.4%

70.9%

41.6%

59.0%

51.3%

74.9%

53.9%

74.7%

Bor

46.0%

36.1%

68.8%

49.2%

42.9%

72.3%

39.1%

94.3%

26.9%

28.9%

39.1%

82.9%

D&G

61.6%

48.5%

59.5%

58.8%

44.9%

68.5%

42.0%

91.2%

32.5%

44.8%

29.0%

77.9%

Fife

60.0%

53.6%

61.1%

53.7%

57.5%

69.9%

63.1%

70.5%

50.6%

64.3%

55.4%

67.4%

FV

55.9%

47.8%

60.8%

49.8%

50.0%

65.1%

54.6%

72.5%

37.7%

50.5%

42.2%

70.6%

Gram

54.2%

45.9%

57.7%

54.9%

45.9%

65.4%

56.8%

89.0%

16.0%

19.6%

21.8%

65.0%

GG&C

65.8%

59.9%

62.2%

56.2%

53.9%

72.3%

49.0%

53.3%

73.8%

88.8%

70.1%

79.9%

High

63.8%

50.0%

63.8%

55.4%

41.8%

68.1%

41.8%

88.7%

20.2%

32.4%

20.2%

83.5%

Lan

62.9%

54.7%

61.6%

52.9%

49.0%

66.8%

45.4%

62.4%

51.6%

68.8%

48.2%

68.1%

Loth

56.8%

52.7%

60.3%

54.3%

62.8%

75.4%

67.3%

79.9%

47.4%

57.9%

50.4%

71.9%

Ork

34.3%

25.0%

66.7%

N/A

25.6%

76.5%

0.0%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Shet

48.8%

32.2%

69.2%

N/A

28.6%

49.5%

25.0%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Tay

59.1%

54.0%

61.7%

51.8%

60.5%

78.2%

62.8%

74.8%

56.7%

73.9%

58.7%

71.8%

WI

50.7%

N/A5

68.0%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

SCOTLAND

60.2%

52.8%

61.5%

54.2%

52.1%

70.5%

51.8%

63.2%

49.5%

62.2%

53.8%

75.0%

  1. 1Method 1 - using BNDIP (2008) P1 child data:– schools within the respective Health Board ranked in descending order by proportion of children with caries experience within respective schools.
  2. 2Method 2 - using local SIMD of child home postcode:– schools within the respective Health Board ranked in descending order by proportion of children with home postcodes in the most deprived local quintile (local SIMD1 2009).
  3. 3Method 3 - using BNDIP (2008) P1 child data:– schools ranked across Scotland in descending order by proportion of children with caries experience.
  4. 4Method 4 - using national SIMD of child home postcode:– schools ranked across Scotland in descending order by proportion of children with home postcodes in the most deprived quintile (national SIMD1 2009).
  5. 5The island Health Boards of Orkney, Shetland and Western Isles have no national SIMD1 datazones and therefore do not feature in analysis relating the methods or definitions of risk using national SIMD1. SIMD data for WI was incomplete preventing analysis by child SIMD.