Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A cross-sectional survey on knowledge and perceptions of health risks associated with arsenic and mercury contamination from artisanal gold mining in Tanzania

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elias Nyanza
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cornelia Jonker
25 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katarzyna Kordas
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cornelia Jonker
28 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katarzyna Kordas
9 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Elias Nyanza
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katarzyna Kordas
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
25 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-74

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement