A cross sectional survey of attitudes, awareness and uptake of the parental pertussis booster vaccine as part of a cocooning strategy, Victoria, Australia
© Donnan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 13 December 2012
Accepted: 10 July 2013
Published: 23 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alberto Tozzi|
|15 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carl Heinz Wirsing von Koenig|
|19 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siranda Torvaldsen|
|17 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ellen Donnan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carl Heinz Wirsing von Koenig|
|6 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alberto Tozzi|
|7 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siranda Torvaldsen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-676|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.