Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Screen more or screen more often? Using mathematical models to inform syphilis control strategies

BMC Public Health201313:606

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-606

Received: 16 January 2013

Accepted: 20 June 2013

Published: 24 June 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Marcus
24 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Althaus
1 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ashleigh Tuite
Resubmission - Version 2
1 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ashleigh Tuite
Resubmission - Version 3
2 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Marcus
21 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Althaus
6 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ashleigh Tuite
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Althaus
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Jun 2013 Editorially accepted
24 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-606

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
(2)
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
(3)
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
(4)
Division of Infectious Diseases, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto
(5)
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College

Advertisement