Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Socioeconomic disparity in cervical cancer screening among Korean women: 1998–2010

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tae Hyun Kim
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Myung-Il Hahm
26 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yunhwan Lee
25 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tae Hyun Kim
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Myung-Il Hahm
12 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yunhwan Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tae Hyun Kim
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 May 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-553

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement