A qualitative study of health information technology in the Canadian public health system
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Kuziemsky|
|22 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Norm Archer|
|10 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kate Zinszer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Norm Archer|
|14 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kate Zinszer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Kuziemsky|
|7 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kate Zinszer|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Norm Archer|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|25 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-509|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.