Skip to main content

Table 4 Differential effects of re-employment on the probability to improve from poor to good quality of life and self-rated health among unemployed persons during 18 months follow-up for gender, age, and type of benefit (n=4308)

From: The influence of re-employment on quality of life and self-rated health, a longitudinal study among unemployed persons in the Netherlands

 

Good self-rated health adjusted model** OR (95% CI)

Good quality of life adjusted model** OR (95% CI)

Total population

2.88 (2.37–3.50)

1.76 (1.54–2.02)

Gender

Men × Unemployed

1

1

Men × Re-employed

3.65 (2.60–5.12)

1.48 (1.22–1.79)

Women × Unemployed

0.82 (0.70–0.96)

1.17 (1.03–1.33)

Women × Re-employed

2.10 (1.62–2.71)

2.40 (1.97–2.94)

Age

18–34 years × Unemployed

1

1

18–34 years × Re-employed

3.07 (1.98–4.76)

1.96 (1.47 (2.61)

35–44 years × Unemployed

0.72 (0.58–0.90)

0.87 (0.72–1.04)

35–44 years × Re-employed

2.49 (1.71–3.63)

1.68 91.30–2.16)

45–54 years × Un-employed

0.83 (0.65–1.06)

0.93 (0.77–1.12)

45–54 years × Re-employed

2.17 (1.45–3.22)

1.66 (1.26–2.18)

55–65 years × Un-employed

0.98 (0.76–1.27)

1.81 (1.47–2.23)

55–65 years × Re-employed

2.07 (1.24–3.46)

2.00 (1.37–2.91)

Ethnicity

Un-employed × Non-native Dutch

1

1

Employed × Non-native Dutch

2.22(1.52–3.22)

1.44 (1.11–1.88)

Un-employed × Native Dutch

1.28 (1.06–1.50)

1.68 (1.46–1.93)

Employed × Native Dutch

4.01 (3.00–5.14)

3.15 (2.60–3.82)

  1. **Adjusted for time, sex, age, education, ethnic background, parenthood, marital status, and type of benefit. OR, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval.