| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLIM elements identified | Applicability as judged by local health care professionals | Adaptations proposed by SLIM developers and accepted by local health care professionals | |||
 |  | Applicable Yes / No | Argument | Adaptation of SLIM protocol | Adaptation of real-life working procedures |
 | Target population |  |  |  |  |
1 | Selection from study cohort | N | GP is the location of finding high-risk groups for diabetes | selection by GP | GP actively search their database for patients with IFG and refer them to intervention |
2 | Selection with OGTT | N | OGTT not used | selection with FBGM | Â |
3 | Only Caucasian subjects | N | ethnicity of patients not known | only Dutch speaking subjects | Â |
 | Techniques and instruments |  |  |  |  |
4 | Appropriate risk communication to participants | Y | Â | Â | Â |
5 | Dietary advice: motivational interviewing | Y | Â | Â | Â |
6 | Dietary advice: goal setting | Y | Â | Â | Â |
7 | Dietary advice: invite partner | Y | Â | Â | Â |
8 | Dietary advice: fixed theme per visit | N | themes are tailored to patient | order of themes may be changed | all themes should be addressed |
9 | Dietary intake with 3-day food record | N | - great variability in intake procedures | - no standard dietary intake | Â |
- no / simple nutritional diaries | - nutritional diaries not obliged | ||||
10 | Exercise training tailored to middle-aged people with overweight | Y | Â | Â | Â |
11 | Exercise intake with maximal test | N | - great variability in intake procedures | exercise intake with submaximal test (steep ramp) | standard use of steep ramp test during intake |
- maximal tests require medical supervision | |||||
 | Delivery mode |  |  |  |  |
12 | Dietary advice: individual, group meeting once a year | Y | Â | Â | Â |
13 | Exercise training in groups of 4-6 | Y | Â | Â | Â |
14 | Exercise training in special SLIM groups | N | creating separate groups is costly | Â | organise special SLIMMER groups |
 | Intensity |  |  |  |  |
15 | Dietary advice | N | Frequency and duration are | - decreasing time intervals between visits | no tailoring of frequency and duration to patient |
- every 3 months | Â | tailored to patient | Â | ||
- duration 60 minutes |  | - intervals ≤ 2 months | - duration 30 minutes | ||
- group meeting 90 minutes | Â | - duration 15-30 minutes | Â | ||
16 | Exercise trainings | Y | Â | Â | Â |
- 1-2 times a week | |||||
- duration 60 minutes | |||||
 | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | ||
SLIM elements identified | Applicability as judged by health promotion expert / local steering comittee | Adaptations proposed by SLIM developers and accepted by local health care professionals | |||
 |  | Applicable Yes / No | Argument | Adaptation of SLIM protocol | Adaptation of real-life working procedures |
 | Materials |  |  |  |  |
17 | Patient brochures | N | black-and-white, text-only documents | up-to-date patient brochures from national institutes | Â |
18 | Manuals | N | - incomplete manuals | - manual developed for exercise training | Â |
- scientific language | |||||
 |  |  | - no distinction between intervention and research | - manuals in readable language, tailored to local professionals |  |
 | Organisational structure |  |  |  |  |
19 | Intervention deliverers are employed by the university; local organisations are not involved | N | Intervention delivery is complex cooperative process between local organisations | - roles and responsibilities described | Â |
- information meeting added to facilitate collaboration | |||||
 | Political and financial conditions |  |  |  |  |
20 | Intervention embedded in national policy | Y | Â | Â | Â |
21 | Intervention embedded in local policy | Y | Â | Â | Â |
22 | Research subsidies | N | - structural finances needed | (not fulfilled) | (not fulfilled) |
- no natural financer |