From: Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS)
Subscale | # items (range) | Sample items* and overall subscale descriptions | Mean (SD) | ICC, % agreement | Range of item ICC or Kappa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Subscales | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Building Height and Setbacks | 3 (0–4) | Smallest and largest setbacks and building height | 1.31 (.644) | .370, 69.0% | .522-.764 |
Building Height: Road Width and Setback Ratio | 3 (0–3) | Smallest and largest setbacks, building height, and road width | .103 (.457) | .614, 97.1% | n/a |
Sidewalk Positive Qualities | 3 (2–3) | Sidewalk presence and width | 2.23 (.419) | .555, 84.6% | .489-1.00 |
Buffers | 2 (0–2) | Buffer presence and width | .826 (.941) | .912, 93.0% | .882-.919 |
Bicycle Infrastructure | 2 (0–3) | Marked bicycle lane, signage | .200 (.706) | .855, 95.4% | .676-.791 |
Building Aesthetics and Design | 4 (0–7) | Street-level windows, building colors and materials | 3.85 (1.81) | .705, 38.0% | .549 - .629 |
Trees | 3 (0–5) | Number and spacing of trees, percent of sidewalk shaded | 2.15 (2.08) | .744, 51.2% | .540-.737 |
Informal Path (single item) | 1 (0–1) | Is there an informal path (shortcut) which connects to something else? | n/a | .554 (K), 91.1% | n/a |
Overall Positive | 7 subscales plus 1 item (3–22) | Sum of subscales: building height and setbacks, sidewalk positive qualities, buffers, bike infrastructure, building aesthetics and design, trees, plus item: cul-de-sac connectivity | 10.78 (3.29) | .752, 25.4% | See above |
Negative Subscales | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Sidewalk Negative Qualities | 5 (0–4) | Trip hazards, obstructions in the sidewalk | 1.09 (1.02) | .675, 55.5% | .494-.796 |
Sidewalk Steepness (children/teens) | 3 (0–5) | Slope, cross-slope (steeper slope acceptable for children) | 1.09 (1.01) | .596, 60.1% | .503- .775 |
Sidewalk Steepness (seniors) | 3 (0–7) | Slope, cross-slope (less steep slope acceptable for seniors) | 2.18 (1.64) | .633, 42.4% | .502- .746 |
Overall Negative Subscale (Child/Teen) | 2 subscales (0–7) | Sum of subscales: Sidewalk negative qualities, sidewalk steepness (children/teens), building height: road width and setback ratio, negative street design/width | 2.18 (1.63) | .693, 42.4% | See above |
Overall Negative Subscale (Senior) | 2 subscales (0–9) | Sum of subscales: Sidewalk negative qualities, sidewalk steepness (seniors), building height: road width and setback ratio, negative street design/width | 3.27 (2.01) | .689, 33.4% | See above |
Overall Subscales | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Overall Segments Score (Child/Teen) | 2 (−1 -19) | Overall Positive – Overall Negative subscales (child/teen) | 8.58 (3.43) | .753, 24.0% | See above |
Overall Segments Score (Senior) | 2 (−2 -19) | Overall Positive – Overall Negative subscales (senior) | 7.49 (3.66) | .758, 22.8% | See above |