Table 1 Study characteristics and designs: Neighborhood Impact on Kids (NIK) Study, Teen Environment and Neighborhood (TEAN) Study, and Senior Neighborhood Quality of Life Study (SNQLS)
From: Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS)
Study | Ages of participants | Regions | Design (quadrants sampled) | Eligible destinations | Total sample size: All routes | Reliability pair sample size: # routes (# segments, # crossings, # cul-de-sacs) | Years of MAPS data collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIK | 6-11 and a parent | San Diego County, CA and Seattle/King County, WA | Activity EnvironmentaX Nutrition Environmentb | Cluster of ≥3 destinations (commercial locations, parks or schools) | San Diego County: 365 | San Diego County: 76 (233, 117, 16) | San Diego County: 2009 |
Seattle/King County: 393 | Seattle/King County: 0 (0, 0, 0) | Seattle/King County: 2009-2010 | |||||
TEAN | 12-16 and a parent | Seattle/King County, WA and Baltimore, MD-DC | WalkabilitycXIncomed | Cluster of ≥3 commercial locations, a park, or a school | Seattle/King County: 427 | Seattle/King County: 72 (167, 67, 31) | Seattle/King County: 2010 |
Maryland-DC: 470 | Maryland-DC: 106 (42, 100, 6) | Maryland-DC: 2009-2010 | |||||
SNQLS | 65-97 | Seattle/King County, WA | WalkabilitycXIncomed | Cluster of ≥3 destinations (commercial locations, parks, or school) | Seattle/King County: 462 | Seattle/King County: 36 (74, 35, 0) | Seattle/King County: 2009 |