Table 2 Global theme: Local perceptions of a community-led cash transfer programme
From: Social acceptability and perceived impact of a community-led cash transfer programme in Zimbabwe
Codes | Basic themes | Organising themes |
|---|---|---|
Community committees | Community members involved in the implementation | 1. Community participation |
Working with local leaders | ||
Selection process | ||
Drawing on local knowledge | ||
Compliance | Community members involved with the monitoring | |
Formal monitoring | ||
Informal monitoring | ||
Buy-in and solidarity | Community-wide appreciation | 2. Social acceptability |
Community-wide benefits | ||
Cooperate with other services | Cash transfers complement other support services | |
More holistic than other programmes | ||
BEAM | ||
Deserving beneficiaries | Fairness of the programme | |
Transparency | ||
Access to uniforms | School attainment | 3. Improved schooling and education |
School attendance | ||
School over subscription | ||
Prompt payment of school fees | ||
School performance | School performance | |
Food intake | Physical health | 4. Improved health and well-being |
Vaccination | ||
General health benefits | ||
Equality | Psychosocial health | |
Reduced caregiver stress | ||
Understanding of children’s needs | Community wide awareness and response to children’s needs | 5. Poverty reduction and social transformation |
Community: agents of change | ||
Birth certificates obtained | ||
Empowered caregivers | Caregivers are empowered | |
Platform for income generation | ||
Children are equal | Greater sense of equality and cohesion | |
Enhanced community dialogue | ||
People are better off | ||
Narrow targeting | Jealousy | 6. Persisting social and logistical challenges |
Undeserving beneficiaries | ||
Illness and disability | Barriers to programme success | |
Men taking the money | ||
Household dynamics | ||
Religion |