Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Social acceptability and perceived impact of a community-led cash transfer programme in Zimbabwe

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynnette Neufeld
7 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keetie Roelen
25 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Morten Skovdal
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keetie Roelen
23 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Morten Skovdal
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Morten Skovdal
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keetie Roelen
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-342

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement