Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Preventing the preventable through effective surveillance: the case of diphtheria in a rural district of Maharashtra, India

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
30 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Revati Phalkey
Resubmission - Version 2
30 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Cherian
12 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arun Humne
28 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Revati Phalkey
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Revati Phalkey
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arun Humne
30 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Cherian
22 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Revati Phalkey
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
8 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-317

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement