Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparing short versions of the AUDIT in a community-based survey of young people

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gallus Bischof
17 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Rubinsky
13 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Anna Bowring
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Rubinsky
20 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Anna Bowring
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Anna Bowring
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-301

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement