Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Is a perceived supportive physical environment important for self-reported leisure time physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged women with poor psychosocial characteristics? An observational study

BMC Public Health201313:280

Received: 14 August 2012

Accepted: 13 March 2013

Published: 27 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
14 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charlie Foster
18 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melvyn Hillsdon
25 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Kylie Ball
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
27 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-280

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Centre for Physical Activity & Nutrition Research, Deakin University
Menzies Research Institute Tasmania