Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effectiveness of Australia’s Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service®: maintenance of self-reported anthropometric and behavioural changes after program completion

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey VanWormer
7 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Lakerveld
21 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes Brug
16 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Blythe O'Hara
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey VanWormer
23 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes Brug
3 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Lakerveld
15 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Blythe O'Hara
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
21 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
26 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-175

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement