This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? a systematic review
© Herzog et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 March 2012
Accepted: 31 January 2013
Published: 19 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Raul Herzog|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Josien Riphagen-Dalhuisen|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Thomas|
|23 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Holly Seale|
|5 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Raul Herzog|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Thomas|
|19 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Josien Riphagen-Dalhuisen|
|25 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Raul Herzog|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|19 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-154|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.