Table 3 Effect (Δ% SCORE* risk assessment), cost (€), CER* (€/% SCORE) and ICER* (Δ €/ Δ% SCORE) in specific subgroups
From: Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular risk management by practice nurses in primary care
Control group | Intervention group | ICER (95% CI) | Effect | Costs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect | Costs | CER | Effect | Costs | CER | |||||
Sex | ♂ | 1,7 | 155 | 91 | 1,6 | 301 | 187 | −1578 (−39811 – 41036) | - | + |
♀ | 1,5 | 171 | 114 | 2,3 | 420 | 185 | 325 (−2662 – 2601) | ++ | + | |
Age | ≤65y | 1,8 | 184 | 102 | 1,8 | 303 | 167 | 5865 (−3257 – 3363) | + | + |
>65y | 1,5 | 133 | 92 | 1,8 | 376 | 213 | 768 (−4076 – 4759) | + | + | |
Educ.* | low | 2,4 | 174 | 74 | 1,8 | 369 | 208 | −340 (−3649 – 3793) | -- | + |
high | 1,3 | 157 | 121 | 1,8 | 319 | 182 | 351 (−3402 – 2923) | + | + | |