Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression to predict condom use intentions including the gender by ‘interruption to sex’ interaction term

From: Which outcome expectancies are important in determining young adults’ intentions to use condoms with casual sexual partners?: a cross-sectional study

Outcome expectancy: causing an annoying interruption to sex Gender % (n) salient Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval p value Model
Safe Male (n = 314) 16.6 (n = 52) 0.26 0.13–0.52 <0.001 Model: X 2 = 28.66, n = 1051, df = 3, p < 0.001 Nagelkerke R2 = 0.04
  Female (n = 526) 27.2 (n = 143) 1.00   
Less safe Male (n = 82) 43.9 (n = 36) 2.02 1.13–3.62 0.02  
  Female (n = 132) 27.9 (n = 36) 1.00