Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression to predict condom use intentions including the gender by ‘interruption to sex’ interaction term

From: Which outcome expectancies are important in determining young adults’ intentions to use condoms with casual sexual partners?: a cross-sectional study

Outcome expectancy: causing an annoying interruption to sex

Gender

% (n) salient

Odds ratio

95% Confidence interval

p value

Model

Safe

Male (n = 314)

16.6 (n = 52)

0.26

0.13–0.52

<0.001

Model: X 2 = 28.66, n = 1051, df = 3, p < 0.001 Nagelkerke R2 = 0.04

 

Female (n = 526)

27.2 (n = 143)

1.00

  

Less safe

Male (n = 82)

43.9 (n = 36)

2.02

1.13–3.62

0.02

 
 

Female (n = 132)

27.9 (n = 36)

1.00