Skip to main content

Table 7 Descriptive characteristics of the studies with an expenditure approach (n = 8)

From: Understanding the role of welfare state characteristics for health and inequalities – an analytical review

Descriptive measure

n (%)

Author (health inequality perspective = *)

Year of publication

  

2005

---

---

2006

---

---

2007

2 (25%)

Olsen & Dahl, Wu & Chiang

2008

---

---

2009

---

---

2010

2 (25%)

Kangas, Stuckler et al.

2011

1 (13%)

Bradley

2012

3 (38%)

Dahl & van der Wel*, Gesthuizen et al.* Vavken et al.

2013

---

---

Articles using health inequality approach

2 (25%)

 

Health inequality measure

2 (100%)

Dahl & van der Wel, Gesthuizen et al.

Education

  

Type of expenditure

  

Social spending

4 (50%)

Bradley et al., Dahl & van der Wel*, Kangas, Stuckler et al.

Health spending

5 (63%)

Bradley et al., Gesthuizen et al.*, Olsen & Dahl, Vavken et al., Wu & Chiang

Health outcomes

  

Self-rated health

3 (38%)

Dahl & van der Wel*, Gesthuizen et al.*, Olsen & Dahl

Infant mortality

2 (25%)

Bradley et al., Wu & Chiang

Life expectancy at birth

2 (25%)

Bradley et al., Kangas

Mortality rate

2 (25%)

Stuckler et al., Vavken et al.

Potential years of life lost

2 (25%)

Bradley et al., Vavken et al.

Child mortality (under 5 mortality rate)

1 (25%)

Wu &Chiang

Low birth weight

1 (13%)

Bradley et al.

Maternal mortality

1 (13%)

Bradley et al.

Change in life expectancy at birth

1 (13%)

Kangas

Health outcome

  

Mortality measure

 

11

Morbidity measure

 

4

  1. Many articles examined multiple outcomes and hence the number of studies using the different health outcomes (15) is greater than the number of studies.
  2. Mortality measures include: infant mortality, life expectancy at birth, mortality rate, potential years of life lost, child mortality, maternal mortality, change in life expectancy at birth.
  3. Morbidity measures include: self-rated health, low birth weight.
  4. * = Studies with an inequalities perspective.