Skip to main content

Table 3 Respondent explanations for not testing their private water supplies at a frequency that met or exceeded provincial recommendations, Newfoundland & Labrador, 2007 (n = 339; multiple explanations per respondent permitted)

From: Investigating public perceptions and knowledge translation priorities to improve water safety for residents with private water supplies: a cross-sectional study in Newfoundland and Labrador

Explanation

Frequency # (%)

No noticeable changes to water, looks and smells normal, trust it*

93 (27.4)

No problems noted in general*

41 (12.1)

Inconvenient to drop off a sample for testing

33 (9.7)

There is no need to test the water that frequently*

30 (8.8)

Inconvenient to pick up sample bottle

25 (7.4)

Lack of information on testing

20 (5.9)

Previous test results were normal*

17 (5.0)

Don’t drink water from the private water source

15 (4.4)

Inconvenient (in general)*

14 (4.1)

No particular reason*

14 (4.1)

Forget or procrastinate*

8 (2.4)

No health problems among household members noted*

6 (1.8)

Others nearby test their water and results normal, so no need*

5 (1.5)

Use a water treatment system*

5 (1.5)

Misinformed about recommended testing frequency*

3 (0.9)

Plan to test soon*

3 (0.9)

Cost*

2 (0.6)

Other**

5 (1.5)

  1. *Initially coded as “other” in closed-ended question; re-categorized based on responses to a follow-up open-ended question.
  2. **Verbatim other responses include:
  3. I was getting the same answer that the water wasn’t suitable for drinking.
  4. We tried to get it tested but the Government wouldn’t do it.
  5. I just moved in.
  6. Afraid they might say it’s not safe to drink.
  7. Inaccurate test results in the past make you question the reliability of the testing.