Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden – a 1 year follow-up study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simone Rodda
24 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diana Cunha
17 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jessika Svensson
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jessika Svensson
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simone Rodda
29 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diana Cunha
30 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jessika Svensson
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Nov 2013 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1087

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement