Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Twentieth anniversary of the European Union health mandate: taking stock of perceived achievements, failures and missed opportunities – a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nicole Rosenkotter
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tamara Hervey
23 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heide Weishaar
25 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nicole Rosenkotter
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heide Weishaar
27 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nicole Rosenkotter
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nicole Rosenkotter
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Nov 2013 Editorially accepted
14 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1074

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement