Skip to main content

Table 3 Global model building summary: PENS prediction of utilization of interconceptional care

From: Barriers to women's participation in inter-conceptional care: a cross-sectional analysis

Model specification

Number of observations

Wald Chisq

Df

Pvalue*

Predisposing Only (Model 1)

352

37.6514

27

0.0835

Enabling Only (Model 2)

344

20.4951

12

0.0583

Needs Only (Model 3)

442

3.8

6

0.7037

Systems Only (Model 4)

425

2.69

3

0.4419

Full Anderson Behavior Model (Model 5)

265

49.0046

48

0.4326

Individual Models

    

   Insurance

442

3.1777

3

0.3650

   Income

359

5.8305

3

0.1202

   Social support

425

1.2121

3

0.7501

   Neighborhood safety

424

3.1148

3

0.3743

   Competing demands

442

0.3698

3

0.9464

   Has a provider

425

2.6900

3

0.4419

   Age

442

8.5929

3

0.0352

   Race/ethnicity

432

1.9461

3

0.5837

   Marital status

440

2.8838

3

0.4099

   Education (HS grad)

442

0.1420

3

0.9864

   Education (Less than HS)

442

2.8830

3

0.4100

   Family size

437

0.6410

3

0.8870

   Drug use

360

6.2302

3

0.1009

   Alcohol use

360

1.1814

3

0.7575

   Smoke

432

22.6342

3

< 0.0001

   Physical health problems

442

1.8854

3

0.5965

   Mental health problems

442

2.1730

3

0.5373

  1. *This is the p-value associated with the specified Chi-Square statistic. Here, the null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between the any of the predictor variables and the outcome.