Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pedro Gil-Monte
14 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Constantinos Kokkinos
29 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jesus Montero-Marin
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jesus Montero-Marin
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pedro Gil-Monte
7 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Constantinos Kokkinos
6 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jesus Montero-Marin
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
30 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-922

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement