This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Modeling the impact of the difference in cross-protection data between a human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine and a human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine in Canada
© Kohli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 February 2012
Accepted: 8 October 2012
Published: 13 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Jit|
|23 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iacopo Baussano|
|30 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michele Kohli|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Jit|
|22 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iacopo Baussano|
|2 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michele Kohli|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|13 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-872|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.