Table 10 Summary results of evidence on the relationship environmental factors and transportation cycling

Walkability

59, 83, 85, 86

82, 82

5

4/6

67

++

Residential density

53 ^M,1, 53 ^F,1

53 ^M,2, 53 ^M,3, 53 ^F,2, 53 ^F,3

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

Land use mix diversity

80

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

Street connectivity

85

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

Access to shops/services/work

35, 35, 35, 38, 53 ^M,1, 53 ^F,1, 53 ^F,2, 53 ^F,3, 64, 77, 77, 91, 91, 90

53 ^M,2, 53 ^M,3, 77, 77, 85

7

14/19

74

++

Access to public transport

50

35, 53 ^M,1, 53 ^M,2, 53 ^M,3, 53 ^F,1, 53 ^F,2, 53 ^F,3

3

1/8

13

0

Access to recreation facilities

85, 91

52

52, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92

5

2/14

14

0

Walking/cycling facilities

64, 64, 64, 80, 90, 91

35, 35, 64, 64, 64, 80, 85, 85

6

6/14

43

(++)

Safety

80, 85

2

N/A

N/A

N/A

Traffic-related safety

41 ^M, 41 ^F, 64, 90, 91

79², 91, 91

35, 35, 35, 35, 64, 79¹, 80, 85

8

5/16

31

00

Crime-related safety

79², 85, 90

91

35, 35, 79¹, 90, 91

5

3/9

33

0

Aesthetics

79¹

91

79², 80

3

1/4

25

0

Urbanization

35, 64, 84, 90, 90, 91, 91, 91

84

5

8/9

89

++

Hilliness

80

64, 91

3

2/3

67

(−)

Quality of environment

77^M, 77^M, 77^F, 77^F

1

N/A

N/A

N/A