Open Peer Review Reports for: Who tended to continue smoking after cancer diagnosis: the national health and nutrition examination survey 1999–2008
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tung-Sung Tseng |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda Pederson |
| 8 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Tung-Sung Tseng |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 1 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - ROBERT BENDEL |
| 27 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Tung-Sung Tseng |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 27 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 20 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Tung-Sung Tseng |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 20 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-784 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
