Skip to main content

Table 2 Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents at baseline before and after adjusting for propensity score

From: Effectiveness of a peer-led HIV prevention intervention in secondary schools in Rwanda: results from a non-randomized controlled trial

Variable

Intervention allocation

P-Value

P-Value

 

Control group

Intervention group

  
 

Rwamagana

Bugesera

Before Adjustment*

After Adjustment**

Sex n (%)

    

  Male

417 (47.55)

543 (50.70)

0.17

0.80

Age

    

  Mean (sd)

17.60 (2.30)

18.41 (2.18)

<0.01

0.95

Ever had sex n (%)

    

  Yes

196 (22.55)

302 (28.76)

<0.01

0.91

Condom at last intercourse n (%)

    

  Yes

52 (6.39)

99 (10.25)

0.13

0.98

  Never had sex

679 (83.42)

755 (78.16)

0.21

0.94

Intercourse in last 6 months n (%)

    

  Yes

62 (7.09)

118 (11.24)

<0.01

0.98

Ever tested for HIV n (%)

    

  Yes

369 (43.11)

564 (56.29)

<0.01

0.73

  Don’t know

17 (1.99)

19 (1.90)

0.51

0.88

Socio-economic status n (%)

    

  Middle

399 (45.65)

349 (32.80)

<0.01

0.63

  High

47 (5.38)

38 (3.57)

<0.01

0.11

Live during the year n (%)

    

  Boarding school, off campus

14 (1.64)

209 (20.47)

<0.01

<0.05

  Parents/Family

283 (33.06)

430 (42.12)

<0.01

0.90

Baseline HIV knowledge

    

  Mean (sd)

6.12 (1.80)

5.91 (1.90)

<0.05

0.94

  1. *Calculated using simple regression models with the baseline characteristic as the outcome of interest, and the intervention group as the independent variable.
  2. **Calculated using multiple regression models. Observations whose propensity scores fell outside of the minimum and maximum values for the opposite group were eliminated from the analysis. A model was fit with the baseline characteristic as the outcome of interest, and the intervention group as the independent variable. It was adjusted for the propensity score.