Skip to main content

Table 2 Prioritized perceived system-wide effects of Zero Tolerance

From: Evaluation of interventions on road traffic injuries in Peru: a qualitative approach

Importance given 1 = high, 5 = low

Effect

Positive + or Negative -

Likelihood (high, medium, low)

Importance (high, medium, low)

Sector/Sub-system involved

1

Narrow target group therefore low impact (inter-provincial public buses only)

-

High

High

All sectors-All building blocks

1

Decreased political commitment due to wide criticism

-

High

High

Central and local government-Leadership and Governance

1

Decreased budget and logistic resources due to criticism

-

High

High

Central and local government-Financing

1

Diverted HR and understaffing in involved sectors (MoT, Police, Ministry of Justice)

-

High

High

Crosscutting-HR & Delivery

1

Decreased police & passengers support to MoT officers

-

High

High

Crosscutting-Delivery

1

Increased accountability perception

+

Low

High

Drivers and vehicle owners-Governance and accountability

1

Opportunity for passengers empowerment

+

Medium

High

People-Governance and accountability

1

Unfulfilled aim to setup information system for M&E

-

High

High

MoT and Police-Information

2

Overburdened police workforce

-

High

High

Police-Delivery

2

Opportunity for coordinated crosscutting activities

+

Medium

High

All sectors-Delivery

3

Unrealistic media-driven expectations

-

Medium

Medium

Media-Leadership & Governance

3

Discrimination feeling of private transport sector (the "bad guys")

-

High

Medium

Private transport sector-All building blocks

4

Overlapping of police and MoT officers' activities

-

Medium

Low

MoT & Police-All building blocks

4

Traffic crowding at check points

-

Medium

Low

Crosscutting-Delivery

  1. MoT: Ministry of Transport; HR: Human resources