Skip to main content

Table 1 Health service delivery capacity needs at 125 low level health facilities in Uganda between June and August 2009

From: Parasite-based malaria diagnosis: Are Health Systems in Uganda equipped enough to implement the policy?

Assessed parameter

Characteristic

N(%)

Facility level

HC II

64(51%)

 

HC III

61(49%)

Facility Ownership

Government

110(88%)

 

Faith Based

13(10%)

 

Private

2(2%)

Tools (Performance capacity)

  

Diagnostic Tools

Functional microscopy HCIII (n = 61)

18(30%)

 

Available malaria RDTs(n = 125)

12(10%)

Antimalarial Drugs available for 3 months

Oral antimalarial drugs ACTs

70 (56%)

 

Parental Quinine available (n = 91)

48(52%)

 

Rectal Artesunate

1 (1%)

 

Normal Saline (n = 9

33(38%)

 

50% dextrose available

32(35%)

 

Intra venous (IV) giving sets

38(42%)

 

Syringes

51(56%)

Guidelines

Treatment guideline for malaria available

108(82%)

 

Referral guidelines

None

Staff and infrastructure‡

  

Work-load

Approved staff position filled with qualified staff

131(18%)

 

In patient space for admission (HCIII n = 35)

9(25%)

Work-flow

Effective triage system in places (n = 111)

33(30%)

Support services

Waste management and infection control tools

Inadequate

Supply chain

Inventory system(stock cards, and consumption data)

None

Quality control

Laboratory external quality assurance (N = 18)

None

Support supervision

Supervision from Malaria focal person 6 months

12(10%)

Information system

Available Out-Patient (OPD) registers

125(100%)

 

Up to date registers available

120(97%)

 

Complete records with vital mortality information

25(20%)

 

Computerised data systems

None

Systems and Role Capacities

  
 

Hold regular monthly meetings

47(56%)

 

Health centre III led by Clinical Officers (n = 61)

9(15%)

 

Health Centre II led by Comprehensive Nurse (n = 64)

36(56%)