Table 1 Summary of FGDs and IDIs conducted, by study site and gender of participants

Participant Type	Study location								Gender
	EHP		ESP		WNB		NCD		Male		Female
	FGD	IDI	FGD	IDI	FDG	IDI	FGD	IDI	FDG	IDI	FGD	IDI
Community-based interviews with men who had a penile modification¹	0	7	0	16	6	6	1	8	7	37	0	0
Community-based interviews with men without a penile modification²	5	0	4	0	2	1	7	3	14	4	4	0
Community-based interviews with women³	3	1	5	7	4	3	4	4	0	0	16	15
Key informant interviews⁴	0	3	1	8	2	7	1	9	3	24	1	3
Total FGDs and IDIs	8	11	10	31	14	17	13	24	24	65	21	18
Total interviews	19		41		31		37		89		39

¹Includes FGDs and IDIs with older men, younger men, mixed groups of men; and 13 IDIs with men carrying our traditional and contemporary penile practices
²Includes FGDs and IDIs with older men, younger men, mixed groups of men
³Includes FGDs and IDIs with older women, younger women, mixed groups of women; and 6 IDIs among female sex workers [to be reported in a seprate paper by Kelly et al.]
⁴Includes interviews with local chiefs, village elders, councillors, health care workers; representatives of National and Provincial Departments of Health; representatives of the National AIDS Council and from Provincial AIDS Committees

ISSN: 1471-2458