Skip to main content

Table 2 Number of external validity items reported in each study by domain

From: External validity in healthy public policy: application of the RE-AIM tool to the field of housing improvement

Author year

Study design

Internal validity grade

External validity domains (maximum possible score)

Reach & representat’n (4)

Implementat’n & adaptation (4)

Outcomes (5)

Maintenance & institutionalisat’n (4)

Total (17)

Intervention: Warmth & Energy Efficiency improvements (post 1980) (n = 19)

Heyman et al. 2010

RCT

A

1

2

3

2

8

Braubach et al. 2008

CBA

A

2

1

1

1

5

Howden-Chapman et al. 2008

RCT

A

2

1

1

1

5

Barton et al. 2007

RCT

A

2

1

3

2

8

Howden-Chapman et al. 2007

RCT

A

2

0

3

1

6

Platt et al. 2007

CBA

A

1

1

4

2

8

Lloyd et al. 2008

CBA

B

1

0

3

2

6

Shortt et al. 2007

CBA

B

2

2

2

2

8

Somerville et al. 2000

UBA

B

2

1

3

1

7

Hopton et al. 1996

CBA

B

2

0

2

1

5

Warm Front Study Group 2006

RC

C

1

1

5

0

7

Allen 2005 a

UBA

C

1

1

2

2

6

Allen 2005 b

UBA

C

1

2

1

1

5

Health Action Kirklees 2005

R

C

1

0

1

0

2

Eick et al. 2004

RCT

C

2

1

4

2

9

Winder et al. 2003

UBA

C

1

0

0

1

2

Caldwell et al. 2001

CBA

C

2

2

3

2

9

Green et al. 1999

RC

C

1

0

3

0

4

Iversen et al. 1986

CBA

C

1

0

1

1

3

Mean (range)

  

1.47 (1–2)

0.84 (0–2)

2.37 (0–4)

1.26 (0–2)

5.95 (2–9)

Intervention: Rehousing/retrofitting +/− neighbourhood renewal (post 1995) (n = 10)

Kearns et al. 2008

CBA

A

1

1

3

2

7

Thomson et al. 2007

CBA

A

2

0

2

2

6

Critchley et al. 2004

CBA

A

0

1

4

1

6

Thomas et al. 2005

CBA

B

2

1

3

1

7

Barnes et al. 2003

CBA

B

2

0

2

2

6

Evans et al. 2002

CBA

B

1

0

2

0

3

Blackman et al. 2001

UBA

C

2

0

2

2

6

Wells 2000

UBA

C

2

0

1

2

5

Ambrose 1999

UBA

C

2

1

3

2

8

Halpern 1995

XUBA

C

2

1

2

1

6

Mean (range)

  

1.6 (0–2)

0.50 (0–1)

2.40 (1–4)

1.50 (0–2)

6 (3–8)

Intervention: Provision of basic housing needs/developing country intervention (n = 6)

Cattaneo et al. 2006

RC

B

2

1

4

1

8

Choudhary et al. 2002

RC

B

1

1

3

1

6

Aga Khan Health Service 2001

XCBA

B

1

1

2

1

5

Spiegel et al. 2003

XCBA

C

2

0

1

1

4

Aiga et al. 2002

XCBA

C

1

1

3

0

5

Wolff et al. 2001

XCBA

C

2

0

2

1

5

Mean (range)

  

1.50 (1–2)

0.67 (0–1)

2.67 (1–4)

0.83 (0–1)

5.5 (4–8)

Intervention: Rehousing from slums (pre 1965) (n = 4)

Wilner et al. 1960

CBA

A

2

1

3

2

8

McGonigle et al. 1936

XCBA

B

2

1

4

1

8

Ferguson 1954

RC

C

1

0

1

1

3

Chapin 1938

UBA

C

2

1

4

2

9

Mean (range)

  

1.75 (1–2)

0.75 (0–1)

3.00 (2–4)

1.50 (1–2)

7.00 (3–9)

TOTAL (n = 39 studies) MEAN (range)

  

1.54 (0–2)

0.72 (0–2)

2.49 (0–4)

1.28 (0–2)

6.00 (2–9)

  1. Study design: RCT: Randomised Controlled Trial; CBA: Controlled Before & After; UBA: Uncontrolled Before & After; XCBA: Cross-sectional Controlled Before & After; XUBA: Cross-sectional Uncontrolled Before & After; RC: Retrospective controlled; R: Retrospective uncontrolled.
  2. List of references available in reference 4 or from the author.