Skip to main content

Table 2 Allocation of professions with high, medium and low occupational prestige to six photographs by human resource professionals

From: Stigmatization of obese individuals by human resource professionals: an experimental study

Occupational prestige

Observed N (%)

Expected N (%) in German Societya

Residualb

PValue

Expected N (%) in an Unbiased Society

Residualb

PValue

 

Obese Women (n = 127)

High

3 (2.4)

20.8 (16.3)

−17.8

 

42.3 (33.3)

−39.3

 

Medium

24 (18.9)

41.6 (32.8)

−17.6

<.001

42.3 (33.3)

−18.3

<.001

Low

100 (78.7)

64.5 (50.8)

35.5

 

42.3 (33.3)

57.7

 
 

Obese Men (n = 126)

High

7 (5.5)

35.4 (28.1)

−28.4

 

42 (33.3)

−35

 

Medium

32 (25.4)

42 (33.3)

−10

<.001

42 (33.3)

−10

<.001

Low

87 (69.1)

48.6 (38.6)

38.4

 

42 (33.3)

45

 
 

Non-ethnic Normal-weight Women (n = 124)

High

54 (43.6)

20 (26.3)

34

 

41.3 (33.3)

12.7

 

Medium

38 (30.6)

71.4 (57.4)

−33.4

<.001

41.3 (33.3)

−3.3

.044

Low

32 (25.8)

32.6 (16.4)

−.6

 

41.3 (33.3)

−9.3

 
 

Non-ethnic Normal-weight Men (n = 126)

High

64 (50.8)

41.0 (32.5)

23.1

 

42 (33.3)

22

 

Medium

43 (34.1)

66.7 (52.9)

−23.7

<.001

42 (33.3)

1

<.001

Low

19 (15.1)

18.4 (14.6)

.6

 

42 (33.3)

−23

 
 

Ethnic Normal-weight Women (n = 127)

High

26 (20.4)

19.1 (15.5)

7

 

42.3 (33.3)

−16.3

 

Medium

69 (54.3)

57.2 (44.8)

11.9

.003

42.3 (33.3)

26.7

<.001

Low

32 (25.2)

50.8 (39.8)

−18.8

 

42.3 (33.3)

−10.3

 
 

Ethnic Normal-weight Men (n = 126)

High

57 (45.2)

18.9 (15.5)

18.9

 

42 (33.3)

15

 

Medium

53 (42.2)

56.7 (44.8)

−3.7

<.001

42 (33.3)

11

<.001

Low

16 (12.6)

50.4 (39.8)

−34.4

 

42 (33.3)

−26

 
  1. aaccording to data from the representative German Federal Health Survey 1998/1999.
  2. bvalues ≥ ± 2.0 correspond to p ≤ .05, values ≥ ± 2.3 correspond to p ≤ .01.