This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparatively low attendance during Human Papillomavirus catch-up vaccination among teenage girls in the Netherlands: Insights from a behavioral survey among parents
© Gefenaite et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 August 2011
Accepted: 21 March 2012
Published: 2 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - cristina giambi|
|14 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlotte Lenselink|
|23 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Giedre Gefenaite|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - cristina giambi|
|26 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlotte Lenselink|
|13 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Giedre Gefenaite|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Giedre Gefenaite|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-498|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.