Table 2 Prevalence of diabetes according to area of residence
From: Prevalence and trends of the diabetes epidemic in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Country [reference] | Year | Urban sector | Rural sector | Urban:Rural ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | All | Males | Females | All | Males | Females | Â |
Bangladesh[35] | 2005a | 8.1 | 7.7 | 8.5 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 3.5 |
India[36] | 1998a | 5.9 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.0 |
India[37] | 1996–1998 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.2 |
India[11] | 1999–2002 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.1 |
India[38] | 2003–2005 | 7.3 | NR | NR | 3.1 | NR | NR | 2.4 |
India[39] | 2005–2007 | 13.5 | 14.0 | 10.2 | 6.2 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 2.2 |
Nepal[31] | 1999–2001 | 14.6 | 14.9 | 14.3 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 5.8 |
Nepal[40] | 2005–2006 | 22.8 | NR | NR | 20.0 | NR | NR | 1.1 |
Pakistan[12]†| 1995 | 10.5 | 11.6 | 10.3 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 7.4 | 1.4 |
Sri Lanka[13] | 2005–2006 | 16.4 | NR | NR | 8.7 | NR | NR | 1.9 |