Skip to main content

Table 4 Association (regression coefficient beta/odd’s ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)) of dose of  PRO-FIT*advice  and counselling with post-test LDL-C and multiple lifestyle behaviours, adjusted for baseline levels of the dependent variable, in the intervention group (n = 181)

From: Is the process of delivery of an individually tailored lifestyle intervention associated with improvements in LDL cholesterol and multiple lifestyle behaviours in people with Familial Hypercholesterolemia?

 

LDL-C

MVPA1

Fat intake

Fruit intake

Vegetable intake

Smoking

Compliance to statin therapy

 

mmol/l

minutes/wk

fat points/day

servings/day

grams/day

yes

yes

 

beta

beta

beta

beta

beta

OR

OR

 

95% CI

95% CI

95% CI

95% CI

95% CI

95% CI

95% CI

Participants who had logged on at PRO-FIT*advice and completed at least one advice module:

−0.18

      
 

−0.45_0.09

      

Participants who had logged on at PRO-FIT*advice and completed the module on:

       

Physical activity

−0.09

0.16

     
 

−0.37-0.19

−0.14-0.45

     

Fat intake

−0.13

 

−0.51

    
 

−0.42-0.16

 

−1.55-0.54

    

Fruit intake

−0.13

  

0.19

   
 

−0.41-0.16

  

−0.05-0.43

   

Vegetable intake

−0.13

   

−7.13

  
 

−0.42-0.15

   

−25.18_10.92

  

Smoking

−0.06

    

0.11

 
 

−0.44-0.32

    

0.01_1.25

 

Compliance to statin therapy

−0.11

     

1.09

 

−0.42-0.19

     

0.41_2.93

Participants who had received face-to-face counselling

N/A2

N/A2

N/A2

N/A2

N/A2

N/A2

N/A2

Telephone booster calls delivered (mean, SD)

0.06

−0.04

0.26

−0.03

−4.66

1.00

1.02

 

−0.06-0.17

−0.10-0.17

−0.16-0.68

−0.13-0.07

−11.94_2.63

0.61_1.64

0.69_1.51

Participants who had logged on, finished at least 1 module3, received face-to-face counselling and at least 1 telephone booster call (=complete intervention-package)

−0.18

0.10

−0.50

0.16

−6.87

0.11

0.90

 

−0.45-0.09

−0.20-0.40

−1.56-0.56

−0.08-0.40

−25.09_11.36

0.01_1.25

0.33_2.44

  1. 1 MVPA=moderate to vigorous physical activity. Due to skewed data, log-linear regression was conducted. Therefore, the beta should be interpreted as follows: a 1% increase of the independent variable is associated with a beta% increase in physical activity.
  2. 2 Due to minimal variation in dose delivered, no association between dose delivered and efficacy could be tested.
  3. 3 For LDL-C this means at least one module, for the lifestyle behaviours, this means the related advice module (e.g. for physical activity, the completion of the physical activity module).
  4. Significant associations between dose and efficacy (p < 0.05) are printed in bold. Effect parameters (beta regression coefficient or odd’s ratio (OR)) either indicated a positive association if LDL-C/lifestyle behaviours improved when regressed to the process, or a negative association if vice versa.