A pragmatic assessment of the relative efficiency of outreach chlamydia screening events conducted in non-clinical settings
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Marian Currie|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Sacks-Davis|
|30 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin Theunissen|
|23 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Marian Currie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Sacks-Davis|
|22 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin Theunissen|
|29 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marian Currie|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|29 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-341|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.