Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A pragmatic assessment of the relative efficiency of outreach chlamydia screening events conducted in non-clinical settings

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Marian Currie
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Sacks-Davis
30 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Theunissen
23 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Marian Currie
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Sacks-Davis
22 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Theunissen
29 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Marian Currie
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
9 May 2012 Editorially accepted
9 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-341

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement