Skip to content


BMC Public Health

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The relationship between workers’ self-reported changes in health and their attitudes towards a workplace intervention: lessons from smoke-free legislation across the UK hospitality industry

  • Laura MacCalman1,
  • Sean Semple2,
  • Karen S Galea1,
  • Martie Van Tongeren1,
  • Scott Dempsey1,
  • Shona Hilton3Email author,
  • Ivan Gee4 and
  • Jon G Ayres5
BMC Public Health201212:324

Received: 14 December 2011

Accepted: 2 May 2012

Published: 2 May 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
14 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matz Larsson
22 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose M Martinez-Sanchez
5 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Shona Hilton
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 May 2012 Editorially accepted
2 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-324

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Scottish Centre for Indoor Air, Institute of Occupational Medicine
Scottish Centre for Indoor Air, University of Aberdeen
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moore’s University
Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Birmingham