Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A community-based participatory approach and engagement process creates culturally appropriate and community informed pandemic plans after the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: remote and isolated First Nations communities of sub-arctic Ontario, Canada

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Massey
15 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nadia Inglis
30 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nadia Charania
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Massey
12 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nadia Inglis
25 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nadia Charania
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nadia Inglis
20 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nadia Charania
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-268

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement