Table 3 Characteristics of rural community respondents that predict their alcohol-intervention preferences
Characteristicsa | Intervention type Coefficient (robust standard error) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | School | Promote safer drinking | Community | Police | GP | Hospital/ED | Pharmacists | Workplace |
Constant | 25.5* (5.21) | 1.45 (4.65) | 7.98 (5.20) | 18.7* (5.83) | 7.58 (3.61) | 12.7* (3.75) | 6.80 (3.35) | 2.39 (3.86) |
High frequency drinking | 0.02 (0.07) | 0.12 (0.06) | -0.12 (0.07) | -0.25* (0.07) | -0.01 (0.05) | 0.16* (0.05) | -0.03 (0.04) | 0.03 (0.05) |
Family/friend drinks too much | -0.34 (0.76) | -0.16 (0.68) | 2.28* (0.76) | -1.02 (0.86) | -0.13 (0.53) | -0.48 (0.56) | 0.26 (0.56) | 0.55 (0.57) |
Female | 2.43 (1.22) | -2.27 (1.08) | 2.17 (1.22) | 1.15 (0.86) | -0.17 (0.85) | 2.32* (0.89) | 0.12 (0.80) | -1.31 (0.91) |
Age | 0.14* (0.05) | -0.01 (0.05) | -0.10 (0.05) | -0.07 (0.06) | -0.09 (0.04) | -0.21* (0.04) | -0.19* (0.03) | -0.07 (0.04) |
Education level | -0.52 (0.24) | 0.86* (0.21) | 0.14 (0.24) | -0.15 (0.27) | -0.29 (0.17) | -0.28 (0.17) | -0.30 (0.16) | -0.24 (0.18) |
Gross annual household income > $78,000 pa | 6.90* (2.28) | 1.02 (2.03) | -2.08 (2.29) | -2.74 (2.56) | -3.48 (1.58) | -3.12(1.67) | -4.03* (1.50) | -4.12(1.71) |
Prefer not to say income | 3.45 (2.47) | 0.30 (2.20) | -1.09 (2.47) | -0.76 (2.76) | -5.11* (1.72) | -1.77 (1.79) | -(1.72) (1.60) | -1.20 (1.82) |
Communityb | 10.5 | 8.68 | 11.0 | 15.1* | 6.33 | 11.2* | 8.32 | 7.92 |