This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Good practice in mental health care for socially marginalised groups in Europe: a qualitative study of expert views in 14 countries
- Stefan Priebe1Email author,
- Aleksandra Matanov1,
- Ruth Schor1,
- Christa Straßmayr2,
- Henrique Barros3,
- Margaret M Barry4,
- José Manuel Díaz-Olalla5,
- Edina Gabor6,
- Tim Greacen7,
- Petra Holcnerová8,
- Ulrike Kluge9,
- Vincent Lorant10,
- Jacek Moskalewicz11,
- Aart H Schene12,
- Gloria Macassa13 and
- Andrea Gaddini14
© Priebe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 25 October 2011
Accepted: 19 March 2012
Published: 28 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth England|
|3 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cornelis Mulder|
|7 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Stefan Priebe|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth England|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-248|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.