Table 2 Multilevel logistic regression for alcohol and cannabis use: results for the full sample
| Â | Beer and wine | Spirits | Â | Cannabis | Â | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | (n = 1,448) | |||||
| Â | OR(95% CI) | Sig. | OR(95% CI) | Sig. | OR(95% CI) | Sig. |
Control variables | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   girls | 0.54 (0.36-0.79) | *** | 0.50 (0.32-0.78) | ** | 0.29 (0.17-0.49) | *** |
   migrants | 0.20 (0.13-0.30) | *** | 0.41 (0.25-0.69) | *** | 0.38 (0.19-0.75) | ** |
   age | 1.41 (1.24-1.60) | *** | 1.41 (1.21-1.64) | *** | 1.38 (1.17-1.62) | *** |
Family SES | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
parent's work status | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   two parents working | 1.49 (0.96-2.30) |  | 1.29 (0.74-2.24) |  | 0.96 (0.51-1.79) |  |
   one parent working | 0.70 (0.35-1.40) |  | 1.37 (0.67-2.80) |  | 1.31 (0.58-2.95) |  |
parents' educational level | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   two parents higher education | 2.57 (1.48-4.48) | *** | 2.92 (1.65-5.16) | *** | 1.98 (0.84-4.66) |  |
   one parent higher education | 1.64 (0.96-2.79) |  | 1.33 (0.73-2.42) |  | 1.58 (0.84-2.97) |  |
Education type | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   technical | 1.23 (0.75-2.01) |  | 1.84 (1.07-3.17) | * | 1.71 (0.84-3.47) |  |
   vocational | 1.75 (1.01-3.01) | * | 3.22 (1.77-5.86) | *** | 4.04 (1.90-8.61) | *** |