Skip to main content


We are working on a new version of this page and we'd like your opinion. See an early preview or learn more.

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The economic impact of stroke in The Netherlands: the €-restore4stroke study

  • Mitchel van Eeden1, 2,
  • Caroline M van Heugten2, 3 and
  • Silvia MAA Evers1Email author
BMC Public Health201212:122

Received: 4 January 2012

Accepted: 13 February 2012

Published: 13 February 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
4 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mitchel van Eeden
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
13 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-122

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

CAPHRI, Research School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University
MHeNS, School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht University
Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences and Department of Neuropsychology & Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience, Maastricht University