Skip to main content

Table 6 Coverage and efficiency ratios of the different ICF Core Sets for the LBP-reports (n = 45) and the two relevance thresholds

From: Aspects of functioning and environmental factors in medical work capacity evaluations of persons with chronic widespread pain and low back pain can be represented by a combination of applicable ICF Core Sets

 

Number of overlapping categories

Coverage ratio (%)

Efficiency ratio (%)

Relevance threshold ≥ 25% (m = 74)

LBP Brief (k = 35)

27

36

77

LBP Comprehensive (k = 78)

43

58

55

CWP Brief (k = 24)

21

28

88

CWP Comprehensive (k = 67)

41

55

61

Obesity Brief (k = 8)

8

11

100

Obesity Comprehensive (k = 108†)

41

55

38

LBP + CWP + Obesity Brief (k = 45†*)

35

47

78

LBP + CWP + Obesity Comprehensive (k = 143†*)

59

80

41

Relevance threshold ≥ 50% (m = 33)

LBP Brief (k = 35)

21

64

60

LBP Comprehensive (k = 78)

25

76

32

CWP Brief (k = 24)

17

52

71

CWP Comprehensive (k = 67)

26

79

39

Obesity Brief (k = 8)

7

21

88

Obesity Comprehensive (k = 108†)

27

82

25

LBP + CWP + Obesity Brief (k = 45†*)

26

79

58

LBP + CWP + Obesity Comprehensive (k = 143†*)

32

97

22

  1. Note: m = total number of ranked categories above the respective threshold; k = total number of categories in the respective ICF Core Set(s); † = categories aggregated on the second level; * = adjusted for overlap between the categories of the three ICF Core Sets.