Skip to main content

Table 4 Coverage and efficiency ratios of the different ICF Core Sets for the CWP-reports (n = 50) and the two relevance thresholds

From: Aspects of functioning and environmental factors in medical work capacity evaluations of persons with chronic widespread pain and low back pain can be represented by a combination of applicable ICF Core Sets

 

Number of overlapping categories

Coverage ratio (%)

Efficiency ratio (%)

Relevance threshold ≥ 25% (m = 76)

CWP Brief (k = 24)

22

29

92

CWP Comprehensive (k = 67)

41

54

61

LBP Brief (k = 35)

29

38

83

LBP Comprehensive (k = 78)

43

57

55

Depression Brief (k = 26†)

19

25

73

Depression Comprehensive (k = 90†)

43

57

48

CWP + LBP + Depression Brief (k = 53*)

37

49

70

CWP + LBP + Depression Comprehensive (k = 131*)

62

82

47

Relevance threshold ≥ 50% (m = 37)

CWP Brief (k = 24)

19

51

79

CWP Comprehensive (k = 67)

29

78

43

LBP Brief (k = 35)

21

57

60

LBP Comprehensive (k = 78)

26

70

33

Depression Brief (k = 26†)

14

38

54

Depression Comprehensive (k = 90†)

26

70

29

CWP + LBP + Depression Brief (k = 53†*)

29

78

55

CWP + LBP + Depression Comprehensive (k = 131†*)

36

97

27

  1. Note: m = total number of ranked categories above the respective threshold; k = total number of categories in the respective ICF Core Set; † = categories aggregated on the second level (expect categories only available on the third level in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set); * = adjusted for overlap between the categories of the three ICF Core Sets.