Symptom load and functional status: results from the Ullensaker population study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Reinhardt|
|12 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jostein Holmen|
|18 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roar Johnsen|
|19 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hedda Tschudi-Madsen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roar Johnsen|
|5 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Reinhardt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hedda Tschudi-Madsen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|18 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-1085|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.