This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study
© Hillgrove et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 December 2011
Accepted: 31 August 2012
Published: 10 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Custer|
|2 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pippa Grenfell|
|3 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tessa Hillgrove|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pippa Grenfell|
|7 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tessa Hillgrove|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-1063|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.