This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Reactions to threatening health messages
© ten Hoor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 20 June 2012
Accepted: 13 November 2012
Published: 21 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Gill ten Hoor|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Brown|
|8 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Good|
|31 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Gill ten Hoor|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Brown|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|21 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-1011|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.