Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nefyn Williams
9 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Easton
25 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marieke F. van Wier
25 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Nana Anokye
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marieke F. van Wier
1 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Nana Anokye
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marieke F. van Wier
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Nana Anokye
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Nana Anokye
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Dec 2011 Editorially accepted
26 Dec 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-954

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement